Evolution of Formal Organizations Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Evolution of Formal Organizations - Term Paper Example The emergence of formal organizations began in Europe, where businesses incorporated their workers into a sort of club within the organizational structure of the business where there was a clear hierarchical system. The owners of the business and their families also belonged to this club and no employee was exempt from membership, which acted as a deterrent against leaving to the employees (Kornblum, 2011). According to Kornblum, as more and business ventures and industries emerged the economies of scale started playing a key role and specialization and division of labor became practical and profitable. This led to the development of a well organized system, in how the running of these establishments were conducted, and where the workers were not required to devotedly belong to their employer’s club or group. Responsibilities and duties were delegated to employees under the manager who could double up as the owner of the corporation. These managers sought out ways to maximize their workers output through various means like longer working hours, which they did without incentives or overtime compensation (Kornblum, 2011). Earlier formal organizations did not offer opportunities for advancement in position or salary especially to the minority groups and women. The policies, rules and regulations that defined these outfits as formal organizations were not adhered to but were just a formality for purposes of registration with the relevant authorities. The chain of command was designed in such a way that each department had a manger or supervisor to whom every worker in that unit bore responsibility. The supervisors or midlevel managers also had a higher authority to report to, and this went on up to the top management. Even if, the top management bore the overall responsibility for the overall performance of the company, they had little hands on participation and involvement in the on goings of the establishments they administered. This created a precedent wh ere the worker’s welfare was neglected, which led to the development of resentment towards the management of the organization causing a decline in employee output and the firm’s productiveness. This led to the formation of worker’s unions, which advocated for better terms and conditions in the work place coupled with considerate social welfare compensation. Companies that recognized the benefits of a more flexible organizational structure reaped the benefits of improved employee motivational levels and increased productivity. This makes workers feel obligated to perform well for a company that they are actively involved in than where they are taken just as a means to an end. Compared to today’s formal organizations earlier establishments had an authority structure that resembled a pyramid where remarkably few people with power were at the top while the majority and powerless people were at the bottom (Kornblum, 2011). In the mid 1900’s, this struct uring gave no room for employees to contribute, in the policy making process, or give their ideas on how best to attain their company’s goals. In today’s formal organizations, workers are involved in the formulation of company policies, and they are consulted on the best possible ways for their firms to accomplish their objectives. This makes formal

Contract Law Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Contract Law Master - Case Study Example This was also the case in Goedecke v Kirwan1where the Court found that an agreement on price was a necessary term of offer and acceptance; hence no final, enforceable contract existed since price had not been agreed upon. Thus Hilary may have some rights under the option, but they may not be fully enforceable. In the case of Barack, he seeks re-possession of his flat. Under the option clause in the agreement, Barack may not have the automatic right to reposses the flat, when there is an option available to the lessee to continue. In the case of Butts v O'Dwyer2 a similar situation arose, where there was an option to purchase the lease property subject to fixing of a price by the third party. In this instance, the Court concluded that it could correctly be said that the complete was incomplete until the price was fixed. The existence of the option indicated that the owner had an obligation to do everything in his power to ensure that the price was fixed through the third party. This is applicable in Hillary's case, since Clauses 5(d) and 17(b) lay out the procedure for fixing of the price in the event an agreement cannot be reached between the parties. ... at Hillary seeks, it may nevertheless place an obligation upon Barack to take necessary steps to ensure that the incomplete term in the contract, i.e, the price is fixed. In the case of Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld)Pty Ltd3 the situation was very similar to Hilary and Barack's case. In this case, the Court specifically stated that Booker (the lessor in this case) had "no grounds for refusing to discharge its obligation" to appoint an arbitrator merely on the grounds that the rental price was not fixed4. It clearly explained that when specific terms on the appointment of a third party have been set out in the original contract, then it no longer remains as a contingent obligation to be performed first before the ultimate obligation, i.e, re-renting the place can be completed. Since the existing option becomes operation on the day of expiry of the earlier lease, once it has been exercised, it is no longer a "conditional or contingent" obligation5. On this basis, the lessee was entitled to specific performance. Applying this precedent in Hillary's case, it appears that Booker may need to perform his obligation to appoint an arbitrator so the price can be fixed, after which the ultimate obligation, i.e, another lease term can also be accomplished. It must also be noted however, that Clause 4(b) states clearly that the option must be exercised "no later than 2 months prior to the expiration of the initial or previous term". In Hillary's case however, the option has been exercised after this period has expired, therefore there is a possibility that her right to exercise her option may no longer be valid, in which case Barack will not be obliged to perform his obligation to secure a rental price. Part B: The question of whether or not Huckabee has a